Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Newsflash

 At the interview on the job did not provide first hand to a future employer (a man) just waited until he can. Do you make a faux pas?
 
FireBoard
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
catholic mark of the beast Sabbath keeping = God's Seal ... Sunday Keeping = Mark of the BEAS (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: catholic mark of the beast Sabbath keeping = God's Seal ... Sunday Keeping = Mark of the BEAS
#15443
Dan Thurman (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
catholic mark of the beast Sabbath keeping = God's Seal ... Sunday Keeping = Mark of the BEAS  
 J In article < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ,  J This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it wrote <massive snip   Since we understand that making a decision to accept Jesus as   Savior,  J and accepting His teachings, is the same as being sealed or  J marked in the forehead by Jesus as one who is saved. We must also  J understand, that accepting the doctrine, teachings, or traditions  J of the Roman Catholic church or any other churches that follow  J these beliefs, would mean we accept the mark of the beast. Also  J understand there will be those that aren?t Catholic or even  J Christian. But they will do as the beast commands for fear of  J death, or loss of their livelihood from not being able to buy or  J sell anything unless he or she had the mark. Which is actually  J making the decision to accept the demands of the beast. These will  J be those who receive the mark in the hand because they were forced  J against their will. The true Catholic or any other Christian that  J accepts these doctrines of men will have received the mark in  J the forehead because they already made the free will decision that  J their church is correct in replacing _script_ures to match  J traditions or doctrines of men. I suppose that it would be  J folly to point out to you that just about every Christian  J denomination worships on Sunday rather than Saturday because it  J celebrates the rise of Christ from the grave on the third say,  J which was a Sunday. Well, yes, I'm sorry to say that it would.  J First you should examine the reason why 'just about' (you are quite  J correct to point out that it is not every one) all Christian  J denominations accept the change of the day of worship. The death and  J resurrection of Christ is celebrated in the Lord's Supper, a  J celebration that was introduced by Christ himself. So where did  J Sunday worship come from? If you examine a previous post I made on  J the subject Sabbith(sic) Keepers - Saturday_or_Sunday? you will  J find a long discourse on the subject (the truth of which has not  J been challenged). So let me add a few other statements on the  J subject:  J The sun was a foremost god with heathendom... The sun has  J worshippers at this hour in Persia and other lands... There is, in  J truth, something royal, kingly about the sun, making it a fit emblem  J of Jesus, the Sun of Justice. Hence the church in these countries  J would seem to have said, 'Keep that old pagan name. It shall remain  J consecrated, sanctified.' And thus the paagn Sunday, dedicated to  J Balder, became the Christian Sunday, sacred to Jesus (The Catholic  J World, March 1894, p.809)  J Sunday being the day on which the Gentiles solemnly adored that  J planet (the Sun)... The Christians thought it fit to keep the same  J day and the same name of it, that they might not appear causelessly  J peevish, and by that means hinder the conversion of the Gentiles.  J (Six Dialogues on the Lord's Day, p.23)  J From a Roman Catholic theologian, Thomas Enright, CSSR,  J President of the Redemptorist College, Kansas City, Mo.  J Prove to me from the Bible alone that I am bound to keep Sunday  J holy. There is no such law in the Bible. It is a law of the holy  J Catholic Church alone. The Bible says `Remember the Sabbath day to  J keep it holy.' The Catholic Church says, No. By my divine power I  J abolish the Sabbath day and command you to keep holy the first day  J of the week. And lo! The entire civilized world bows down in  J reverend obedience to the command of the Holy Catholic Church.  J (Feb.18th, 1884)  J Of course the Catholic church claims that the change was her  J act... And the act is a MARK of her ecclesiastical power and  J autrhority in religious matters. (Letter, 28th Oct. 1895 from  J C.F.Thomas, Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons)  J Sunday is our MARK of authority... The Church is above the  J Bible , and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that  J fact. (Catholic Record, 1st September 1923)  J The authority of the Church could therefore not be bound to the  J authority of the _script_ures, because the Church had changed... the  J Sabbath into Sunday, not by command of Christ, but by its own  J authority. (Canon and Tradition, p.263)  J The Convert's Catechism p.50 says:  J Q. Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday?  J A. We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic  J Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday.  J From the Roman Catholic Doctrinal Catechism , p.174:  J Q.- Have you any other way of proving that the church has power  J to institute festivals of precept?  J A.- Had she not such power...she could not have substituted the  J observance of Sunday, the first day of the week for Saturday, the  J seventh day, a change for which there is no _script_ural authority.  J Or, to put it another way, the Catholic Church says the  J following:  J The Pope has power to change times, to abrogate laws, and to  J dispense with all things, even the precepts of Christ. (Decretal De  J Translat. Episcop. Cap.)  J To quote the Catholic Record of 1st September 1923 again:  J Sunday is our Mark of authority... The church is above the  J Bible and this transference of sabbath observance is proof of that  J fact and any Protestant who keeps Sunday acknowledges this.  J Protestant Churches that worship on Sunday are (perhaps  J unwittingly) accepting this mark of Catholic authority. They are not  J following Apostolic tradition as Sunday-keeping never was an  J Apostolic tradition.  J In the book of Revelation chapter 14 and verse 9 God gives us a  J solemn warning not to receive the mark of the beast. Everyone will  J have to make the choice as to whom they will give allegiance. The  J false church of the Sunday sabbath or God's true church that will  J have the mark, or seal, of God.  J God's church is described in Revelation chapter 14 verse 12 as  J keeping the (original 10) commandments of God and having the faith  J of Jesus. In chapter 7 of the same book the faithful are described  J as having the seal of the living God... on their foreheads.  J (Vs.2,3)  J What is a seal? A seal is something that is affixed to official  J documents to show the authority of the one who is doing the sealing.  J For example the seal of the Queen of England says:  J Elizabeth Regina - It gives her name  J Queen - It gives her _title_  J Of England - It gives her dominion.  J Where do we find the seal of God  J When we look at the fourth commandment there we find:  J it gives the name - the Lord God  J it gives the _title_ - Creator  J and it gives the dominion - the heavens and the earth, the sea  J and all that is in them.  J Ezekiel 20:20 says: hallow my Sabbaths, and they will be a sign  J between me and you, that you may know that I am the Lord your God.  J In Isiaih chapter 8 verse 16 we are told to bind up the  J testimony, seal the law among my disciples.  J Within the word itself we find evidence of the fact that the  J Sabbath contains the seal of God.  J The word Sabbath is made up of two words: Sab and Bath. 'Sab'  J means 'father'  J and 'ath (oth)' means 'sign,'  J the prefix 'b' before 'ath' means 'dwelling place'.  J So the word Sabbath means:  J 'The dwelling place of the sign (or seal) of the Father.'  J Then I suppose that according to you, we should not do such a  J thing and therefore not celebrate the rise of Jesus. Paul, your  J supposition is not only erroneous but un_script_ural. Where is the  J command to celebrate the rise of Jesus by worshipping on Sunday? You  J give no text to support your assertion.  J 1 Cor 11:25-26 After the same manner also he took the cup, when  J he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood:  J this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. [26] For as  J often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the  J Lord's death till he come.  J The Lord's Supper is there to remember Christ's death on the  J cross, made a celebration because of His rise.   That's very Satanic of you.  J No comment, Paul. Perhaps you would like to rethink your basis  J for making such a statement.  J love  J JB If your not living in Oklahoma JB, you're just camping out ! Dan Thurman - Home Sweet Oklahoma Wednesday, 3 December 1997 at 6:16. Fidonet : 1:170/302.15 - Internet : This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .!. .!. TerCost there now is T-Shirt: .!. .!.                  /~_____/~ .!.                 /_/| T-  |_ .!.                    |Shirt| .!.                    |_____|
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop

Who's Online

We have 71 guests online

Fred Dust - divorced after 2 month of marriage

And it all could be so beautifu... property costa del sol india phone card coolcarsblog.co.uk lA little over two months ago, lucky singer Limp Bizkit, Fred Durst, announced to the world on a blog that he married his girlfriend, Esther Nazarov. Relationship had to be perfect, couple well-chosen and proven over the years. Unfortunately, only a few weeks after the intimate ceremony in Las Vegas Durst once wrote in an online diary: I would like to www.moto-used.co.uk used cars wetter in Polen inform all concerned that Esther and I decided that it was time to go separate ways in life. Thank you to everyone who supported us. I am grateful for the support and warm words. Very. I can also say that they both hold up well and parting culturally, in a positive atmosphere.

Pamela Anderson: I'm not a bancrupt!

A few days ago we wrote reviews.elegant-auto.co.uk Cars car supermarket about the debt, which has caused the Pamela Anderson, as every year, changing the decor of his house. The owner of the famous zgranulowanych breast wished costly and sophisticated alterations, and when the contractor sent its bill Ceased to answer calls. Currently, debt is more than 1.2 million dollars, but Pam reviews.best-car.co.uk Bungalow motor.elegant-cars.co.uk insists that ... There are no debts. I am completely financially stable, and I thank all those who contested the recent media reports - wrote in a statement issued yesterday Anderson. It is true that I am still in the course of discussions with some of the subcontractors working on my house. But that's because after paying millions of dollars for its construction still get a wrong call for payment of accounts. My lawyers check out how the work moto.excellent-car.co.uk Wohnwagen entsorgen used cars has been done and whether professionals actually have the right to require such enormous sums. Where appropriate, it will pay, if not - it does not. I am only sorry that one of the performers went with the whole affair to the press.