http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/6587 The Silent Massacre: Electronic Torture & Mind Control in America and Law Enforcement Complicity - Gangstalking Terrorism Mon, 05/25/2009 - 17:37 - Arthur Cristian Electronic Torture & Mind Control in America and Law Enforcement Complicity The Silent Massacre - Part 1 By Nicholas Kirkland 14th March 2009 [Editor's Note: This is the first part of a five part essay by Nicholas Kirkland which overviews the means and methods employed by governments and some powerful organizations, to psychotronically harass and torture innocent people; and the complicity of law enforcement in that endeavor. This essay is one of the more thorough and cogent explanations that I've read to date that reveiws all aspects of psychotronic assault and its impact upon the victim. There is an urgent need for science professionals of decency and morality to step up to the plate and not only assist victims of psychotronic torture to unmask this activity, but to help discover countermeasures to thwart and countervene these assaults. There is no greater crime against humanity than psychotronic torture and harassment. It must be stopped and its perpetrators brought to justice. ...Ken Adachi] The Silent Massacre - Part 1 Electronic Torture & Mind Control in America and Law Enforcement Complicity By Nicholas Kirkland March 14, 2009 Author's Note In recent years, scientists have learned how to locate by remote, focus on, and lock into a person's brain to manipulate that person's thoughts and thus his actions. Mind control assaults now loom as one of the main challenges of the 21st century. The targeted person often never discovers that he has become a mind control victim, and he ends up hurting others, taking his own life, or simply becoming another Alzheimer statistic. This paper discusses some of the elements of what I call Electronic Stalking and Mind Control (ESMC). While writing this paper, the people who monitor me electronically and continually interfere with my computer and emails and tap my phones, often entered my PC to make changes in the narrative to discourage me and try to make me look crazy. Keeping the paper intact and ensuring accuracy has been a constant battle. Even now, after finishing the paper, when I go back to add a salient point, I often find that a portion has been altered or deleted. Powerful forces do not want papers such as this one written and disseminated. Fortunately, the internet brings together targeted individuals (TIs) of electronic torture and mind control from all conceivable backgrounds. Race and ethnicity, color, gender, religion, politics, philosophical views, and all other human characteristics and thought, fade and become one as targets suffer from the same evil. This paper is written principally for those victims. Some readers may find this paper _object_ionable when I talk about who initiated my ESMC and who probably continues to manage it by proxy. Nevertheless, I hope that the reader can get past those _object_ions and read the entire content. Targeted individuals (TIs) will readily identify with what I talk about in this paper. Those who are not TIs, but who are intellectually curious about electronic and mind control assault, will learn much about a sick attack upon tens of thousands of targets that also indirectly affects everybody in lives of those targeted individuals. The human resources and the enormous cost required to carry out electronic stalking and mind control, re-enforced in many cases by gang stalking, almost certainly limit its use to governments. Only governments can mobilize the enormous outlay of funds and successfully camouflage the use of those funds. Only governments have the sophisticated equipment and computers required for electronic abuse and mind control. Only governments can train in secrecy the cadre of handlers who administer the electronic assault and mind control activities, using deception and psychology. Even mega corporations and businesses would not be able to carry out electronic assault and mind control in secrecy unless they did so under cover of government work and with government protection. Several countries, including the United States of America, have experimented with directed energy weaponry and mind control for many years. Background I was first targeted for surveillance by the Israelis in a South American country no later than 1978. Let me back up to explain. I was working for the U. S. Government in South America when the 1973 Arab-Israeli War broke out. An historian by academic training, I started looking into the causes of the war and realized that Israel was not the poor beleaguered nation that U. S. media portrayed but instead pursued internal and foreign policies that caused most of the Middle East problems. Shortly after my enlightenment, pro-Israeli Americans with whom I worked started testing my views. Their attempts to intimidate me had the opposite affect. Instead of remaining quiet, I became more vocal in expressing my beliefs. Only recently have I remembered an incident in that country that may have portended the current electronic torture and mind control. In about 1976 or 1977, for several evenings while in my bedroom before retiring I was struck suddenly with a sense of overwhelming gloom that tended toward panic. It dissipated during the night, and the following day I felt normal. In retrospect, I believe that either my mind may have already been hooked and unknown persons manipulating my mind or I was being targeted by some remote-operated electromagnetic force. (More on that later.) Five years later I was assigned to a different South American country. One of the national employees who worked in my section was a Jewish woman who had worked with the Israeli Consulate before that office closed, and then she began working with the U. S. representation in that country. One day when I had a problem with a molar, I asked that person to recommend a dentist. She referred me to a German Jewish dentist, who supposedly did a root canal on that tooth. After retirement, in the 1990's, I went to an American dentist with problems with the same molar on which the South American dentist had supposedly performed the root canal. The local dentist found in the tooth a tiny cylindrical pin-like _object_. At the time, I thought little of it. However, now in retrospect, that little _object_ had to be a tiny bug. The South American dentist also wanted to place a filling in-between my two front teeth, claiming that there was decay between the teeth. He obviously intended to implant an incredibly tiny camera in that location. Thirty years later those two teeth remain perfectly sound. I liked the employee who recommended the dentist, and at the time I had no reason at all to doubt that she was just a nice, friendly national employee who happened to be Jewish and who happened to find work with the U. S. Government. When other employees reported to me that she got to the office early in the morning to go through the papers in my desk, I dismissed those charges as simply tales manufactured out of jealousy. After I left the country for another assignment, that employee lost her job. Although I had given her excellent performance evaluations, she told others that I caused her to be fired. In actuality, I did not find out that she had been dismissed until much later. In hind sight, I believe that her guilt convinced her that I had found out about her duplicity. Apparently that employee did not stop working with the Israelis when she took the job with the U. S. Government. In the 1970's, Israeli Nazi hunters were still active in South America. The dentist probably worked with them, and the employee in my office may have also cooperated in the hunt. One of the contractors who worked with the American Government and who alternated between Argentina and the country in which I was assigned was known to be associated with that group. The U. S. Government, in fact, cooperated with and probably even funded the Nazi hunters. The Nazis probably included anybody who opposed Israel and its pro-Israel factions. The minuscule device implanted by the dentist in South America in the late 1970's may have had only limited capability. It was undoubtedly used to listen to my conversations as well as perhaps to track my movements. Since that time, however, much more sophisticated, high-tech, intelligence-gathering and mind control equipment and software have been developed, tried, and put into operation. Over the years, I continued to speak out against Israel's foreign policy and our support for it. In the 1970's, I defended the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) when it was still considered a renegade group, and in 1984 I became a member of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee at a time when Americans were being led by the U. S. media down the anti-Moslem path. I never occupied an important decision-making position in the government; yet, to the Israelis, an enemy is an enemy, regardless of his rank. I articulate my thoughts, and my friends respect my opinions. Thus, I am a threat. In 1985, I was reassigned to an African post. Several years later, on the eve of the Gulf War, when it looked like President George Bush (the elder) was going to attack Saddam Hussein, I _object_ed to that action. Taking advantage of a process known as the dissent channel, in which American government employees abroad may express opposition to U. S. foreign policy, I sent several cables to the Secretary of State stating my opposition to the war and pointedly charging that the principal reason for the U. S. attacking Hussein was not to assist Kuwait but to fight a proxy war for Israel to maintain Israeli hegemony in the Middle East. However, the media had already pumped up the American public to support the so-called Gulf War. I was among only a handful of thoughtful Americans who opposed that war, and I am quite sure that my opposition became duly noted by U. S. pro-Israel factions as well as the Israelis. My cables criticizing both the U. S. and Israel for their Middle East policies may have triggered much more advanced electronic surveillance. My hind-sight observations tell me that probably in the early 1990's pro-Israel elements within the FBI took over my surveillance from the original perpetrators when I retired and returned to the United States, probably on the pretended grounds that I was a subversive and a suspected terrorist. Their mind control assault on me probably began in the early-1990's and increased in intensity over the last ten to fifteen years. When I retired in 1991, I continued to speak out against Israel in conversations with friends and in letters to editors of newspapers. I knew that elements in U. S. intelligence loyal to Israel had placed me on their watch list and that they were following my activities. After retiring, I continued to travel abroad occasionally, usually to Central America, where I owned property. Once when I returned to the Houston international airport from one of the trips, a rookie immigration official processed my entry. A veteran officer stood nearby. When the rookie scanned my passport and viewed his monitor, he looked perplexed. He turned to the older officer and pointed to something on his monitor that he obviously did not understand. The veteran officer took a quick look and said, ADOD (Advise Department of Defense). My computer has been hacked and my phone tapped for years. A recent accidental discovery strongly suggests that the hackers and phone tappers are Federal agents or foreign agents working with the permission of U. S. intelligence. Here is what happened. One day I entered my email Sent File to copy a paragraph that I had written to a correspondent about the tiny device having been implanted in a molar while living in South America in 1978. I cut and pasted that paragraph and re-sent it. Because my computer is monitored and my emails sometimes deleted or changed, I went back to the Sent box to see if the message had actually gone out. When I opened the sent message, I was astonished to see three words encased in blue-lined rectangular boxes: ISRAEL, MIDDLE EAST, and SOUTH AMERICA. As a former government employee, let me explain why those three areas were highlighted. Intelligence organizations in every country divide their offices into geographical areas, including Israel, Middle East, and South America. Copies of my email went to those three offices in some intelligence agency in some country. Every U. S. law intelligence agency, including the Department of State and other agencies, has personnel sections that deal with regional affairs. Whoever monitors my email spotted my references to Israel, the Middle East, and South America and marked that email for copies to be sent to those regional affairs offices. I suspect that copies not only went to U. S. intelligence agencies but also to the Mossad. The secret monitors never imagined that I would go back into a previously sent letter to cut and paste. Finding the highlighted words was a total accident, but a very fortunate one for me, for it told me that somebody monitors my email correspondence and that he is not looking for kiddy porn, drug, and money laundering rings but for material dealing with political views. After passage of the so-called Patriot Act, anybody working with the FBI can justify monitoring a citizen's email and tapping his phones without getting judicial approval. Later, to make their flub-up appear to be a computer glitch or a common internet action, the same monitors encircled other words on several other letters; however, when they saw that I had not fallen for that deception, they quit doing it. In view of the fraternal cooperation between the FBI/CIA and the Mossad, the monitor of my emails could be an agent of the latter. What I do not know is the location of the person who monitors my computer, as computers can be hacked from anywhere in the world, including Monroe, Louisiana, where I live, New York City, or Tel Aviv. Freedom of _expression_ in the United States seemingly comes at a price. Although I have never belonged to the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Survivalists or any other radical organization, I have openly and consistently condemned Israel. As an American, I thought that I had the right to do so. Apparently I was wrong. One can publicly criticize England, France, Mexico, or any other country in the world