|
|
Newsflash
 How many girls Danielle Lloyd dreamed of superstardom. Seduced view of pomp, parties and life from the top shelf perceived encroachment into the world of celebrities as the solution to all their problems. But the desperate desire to be famous is not nearly killed her. |
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot? (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
|
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
Is there still an intention to hold a moot this Friday? I realise the moot may be advertised on sites like Witchvox etc, so I suppose there should be some sort of announcement if it's cancelled? Ruth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
moot may be advertised on sites like Witchvox etc, so I suppose there should be some sort of announcement if it's cancelled? Ruth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
moot may be advertised on sites like Witchvox etc, so I suppose there should be some sort of announcement if it's cancelled? Ruth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
Gemma, I'm glad your back as I was looking forward to meeting you. Kathy, please state what you are doing (I've had no response to my email) .. are you involved or not? ... I can't be arsed with this toing and froing ... one minute one persons not involved then the others aren't .. then they are back etc. It's all rather getting on my nerves to be fair. Right I'll be going offline in a couple of days time for about 2 weeks and I hope that all this crap is resolved and that there is still a group to come back to. On 28 Sep, 11:55, Gemma x <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Hi Ruth, Please see my new thread. I would like to attend the moot. If you wish to join me I would be very happy to see you there!! Thanks, Gemma xx On 28 Sep, 08:39, Swordravenstar <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Is there still an intention to hold a moot this Friday? I realise the moot may be advertised on sites like Witchvox etc, so I suppose there should be some sort of announcement if it's cancelled? Ruth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
Are you planning to attend the moot this week? You haven't said either way (I don't think!!) and I too am looking forward to meeting you, we have formed a nice little friendship across the cyber seas!! Gemma xx On 28 Sep, 18:42, Juls77 <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Ok, well I have no idea what's going on now. Gemma, I'm glad your back as I was looking forward to meeting you. Kathy, please state what you are doing (I've had no response to my email) .. are you involved or not? ... I can't be arsed with this toing and froing ... one minute one persons not involved then the others aren't .. then they are back etc. It's all rather getting on my nerves to be fair. Right I'll be going offline in a couple of days time for about 2 weeks and I hope that all this crap is resolved and that there is still a group to come back to. On 28 Sep, 11:55, Gemma x <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Hi Ruth, Please see my new thread. I would like to attend the moot. If you wish to join me I would be very happy to see you there!! Thanks, Gemma xx On 28 Sep, 08:39, Swordravenstar <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Is there still an intention to hold a moot this Friday? I realise the moot may be advertised on sites like Witchvox etc, so I suppose there should be some sort of announcement if it's cancelled? Ruth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
what does bumps on your back mean? Moot?
|
|
|
by it. Either you trust me that there's more to it than meets the eye and I was trying to act in the best interests of all or you dont. I can't and wont influence that & frankly, at this point in time, I'm past caring. I'm being torn apart by this in case you hadn't realised it so maybe it would be best if I at least take a couple of months off until - hopefully - you've all moved on to something else. And Julie, you can ask Hannah and Onion if I replied or not. . . .I sent the same email to all three of you & they'll confirm, I'm sure, that your address WAS there along with theirs. I will now say no more. On 28 Sep, 22:43, Juls77 <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: That's not what upsets me ... I'm upset by the following :- 1- the dramatic fashion in which you resigned knowing full well it was gonna rally interest as to why and support for you as founding and much loved member (including me hence why I posted my support for you). To me your decision to stand down was rash! 2. You state that you CARE for the group, yet when you left you took all your information with you leaving only a few bits - if you CARE for the group why take the information away .. I know you researched it and wrote it but it just doesn't make sense to take it all if you're only concern is us. 3. Ur note that your only here because Heather, Steve and Becky aren't - so if they were still here does that mean you wouldn't be? So if we have Steve, Becky and Heather we can't have you? 4. You stated that Heather, Steve and Becky 'abandoned' the group - I found that strange as Becky went to the trouble to explain herself so I contacted her to see if she was alright and she did nothing but speak highly of you, of the group and how she's going to miss us and even asked me to post that she is still going to the witches ball, any of us are more than welcome to go with her if we wish and something about how the proceeds of the ball goes towards land for witches to use. I was wondering why she couldn't post that herself and she can't because .... 5. It turns out you have deleted Becky from PP meaning she cannot post ..... that's not fighting fair in my eyes cause that makes it look like she's 'abandoned' us when she hasn't .......... and you're still sniping - apart from saying that Becky didn't give the *whole* story (as you may have guessed) I really dont want to go into Friday's events Quite frankly I'm shocked by all of this as I was your biggest advocate, I'm now suspicous of you and your sincerity. I'm sure everyone will rally round etc but frankly Kathy I'm shocked at how you've dealt with this and for what it's worth, I'm disappointed, disheartened and you have well and truly come off the pedestal I had you on. It's interest I didn't get ur email cause ur in my addy book and I scan my junk mail thoroughly cause I'm using freecycle alot at the moment as moving and getting rid of stuff. I think it's more likely you didn't respond because you didn't like what I said. On 28 Sep, 21:36, selene <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Oh and Juls, I DID reply to your email - I have no idea why you haven't had my reply. As for being gone and back again. . . what was I meant to do with Heather Steve & Becky gone - just leave anyway and screw the group? Well I'm sorry if that upsets you but it's not my way. I CARE about this group strangly enough - which is why I wanted to quit to save it. On 28 Sep, 18:42, Juls77 <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Ok, well I have no idea what's going on now. Gemma, I'm glad your back as I was looking forward to meeting you. Kathy, please state what you are doing (I've had no response to my email) .. are you involved or not? ... I can't be arsed with this toing and froing ... one minute one persons not involved then the others aren't .. then they are back etc. It's all rather getting on my nerves to be fair. Right I'll be going offline in a couple of days time for about 2 weeks and I hope that all this crap is resolved and that there is still a group to come back to. On 28 Sep, 11:55, Gemma x <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Hi Ruth, Please see my new thread. I would like to attend the moot. If you wish to join me I would be very happy to see you there!! Thanks, Gemma xx On 28 Sep, 08:39, Swordravenstar <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote: Is there still an intention to hold a moot this Friday? I realise the moot may be advertised on sites like Witchvox etc, so I suppose there should be some sort of announcement if it's cancelled? Ruth- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Who's Online
We have 17 guests online
Fred Dust - divorced after 2 month of marriage
And it all could be so beautifu... Furniture accessories directory motors.nice-car.co.uk previews.marvelous-car.co.uk lA little over two months ago, lucky singer Limp Bizkit, Fred Durst, announced to the world on a blog that he married his girlfriend, Esther Nazarov. Relationship had to be perfect, couple well-chosen and proven over the years. Unfortunately, only a few weeks after the intimate ceremony in Las Vegas
Durst once wrote in an online diary: I would like to plastics used cars previews.japan-car.co.uk inform all concerned that Esther and I decided that it was time to go separate ways in life. Thank you to everyone who supported us. I am grateful for the support and warm words. Very. I can also say that they both hold up well and parting culturally, in a positive atmosphere.
Pamela Anderson: I'm not a bancrupt!
A few days ago we wrote Car reviews motorization.great-auto.co.uk Used cars about the debt, which has caused the Pamela Anderson, as every year, changing the decor of his house. The owner of the famous zgranulowanych breast wished costly and sophisticated alterations, and when the contractor sent its bill
Ceased to answer calls. Currently, debt is more than 1.2 million dollars, but Pam reviews.deluxe-car.co.uk used cars autos.cars-site.co.uk insists that ... There are no debts. I am completely financially stable, and I thank all those who contested the recent media reports - wrote in a statement issued yesterday Anderson. It is true that I am still in the course of discussions
with some of the subcontractors working on my house. But that's because after paying millions of dollars for its construction still get a wrong call for payment of accounts. My lawyers check out how the work User Interface Design verizon wireless prepaid kate moss has been done and whether professionals actually have the right to require such enormous sums. Where appropriate, it will pay, if not - it does not. I am only sorry that one of the performers went with the whole affair to the press.
|
|
